Thursday, 14 June 2012

Lecture 8 and 9


Billboards, magazines, commercials, bus stops, radio, online, newspapers - advertising is everywhere and issues focusing on the ethical and moral position of such advertisements will always be thrust into the media spotlight.  Lecture 8 focused on this issue.

After being shown several advertisements, students were asked to grade each sample as ethical or unethical, and good taste or poor taste.  It was obvious that the student opinion was divided.  The ethical standing and tastefulness of each ad was rated by each student based upon their own personal opinion.  This variable guarantees a range of responses.

The lecture discussed three ethics theories - deontology, consequentialism, and virtue ethics.  Deontology focuses on the place of rules, principles, and duties (all ethics codes are deontological) and the idea that ethical issues are generally a matter of choosing the lesser of two evils.   Consequentialism is the idea that getting a 'good' or 'right' outcome is all that matters, regardless of how it is achieved (the end may justify the means). Finally, virtue ethics centre around the belief that goodness (or happiness) comes from good dispositions or habits of character.  These habits are 'virtues' such as couragem justice, temperance, and prudence, and are the 'golden mean' of behaviour.

The lecture opened students up to the world of ethics in the media and allowed us to understand the thought, beliefs, and control behind everyday advertisements.

I quite enjoyed the examples that were shown during the lecture and found myself revisiting my own initial impressions of the advertisements when I was exposed to them upon release. It was interesting to see how my opinion weighed up against that of my cohort and the official board responsible for reviewing such media.


The ninth lecture focused on news values.

It was explained that news values are not constant across different cultures and countries and often relate to such structures as the 'inverted pyramid'.

"If it bleeds, it leads."

This news value is exceptionally popular in major news outlets.  Violence, death, and human tragedy will always 'sell' faster than positive stories, and it is unlikely that this trend will ever fade.

The darling Professor Johan Galtung penned what he perceived to be the 12 (plus) factors of news worthiness. The list consisted of the following:

  • Negativity
  • Closeness to home (proximity)
  • Recency
  • Currency
  • Continuity
  • Uniqueness
  • Simplicity
  • Personality
  • Expectedness (predictability)
  • Elite nations or people
  • Exclusivity
  • Size

A fabulous list, no doubt.  Personally, the list seems like more of an ingredients list for a News Cake - the ingredients (on their own) are tasty, but boring. The right combination of ingredients? A Masterchef quality cuisine. Delish.


Tuesday, 5 June 2012

People Who Terrify Me

...okay, well actors who make me nervous. 

Cillian Murphy haunts me in his Scarecrow mask from 'Batman Begins', Steve Buscemi and his arraignment of characters give me the royal heebeejeebies, and Bruce Wayne is a distant memory when I remember Christian Bale's murderous Patrick Bateman from 'American Psycho', but despite some of the great actors on my list (Jack Nicholson, Tobin Bell, Christopher Walken, Bela Lugosi, Sir Christopher Lee, the list goes on),  Williem Dafoe takes the cake. I think it may have been his portrayal of the Green Goblin in the 2002 film, 'Spiderman',or perhaps he just has one of those faces, but Mr Dafoe has scared the socks off me since I can remember. His voice? His eyes? His nasolabial fold perhaps (yes, unfortunately I do know what smile lines are called - thank you Sims 3). The man has more talent than creep however, so I say all that I do with the utmost respect. 


I don't scare easily and, being an avid watcher of horror films, I look for the thrill of it, so Williem Dafoe you crazy cat, I award you with the highest of fives. Well played, old chap.

The World of Fandoms

My love for film and TV is not a normal one. When I find a series I love, I am drawn in completely - the script, the characters, the plot developments; everything about a well designed story is irresistible to me.
I have a rather interesting list of my favourite worlds. From my childhood loves of Harry Potter and Doctor Who, to my teenage obsessions with The Hunger Games, Sherlock, Supernatural, and The Vampire Diaries, the world of make-believe has long since captured my attention.

I admire creativity, I admire passion, I admire vulnerability, and I admire intelligence.
Other viewers who find themselves apart of these worlds (known fondly as 'fandoms') have my utmost respect. Below are my favourite fan created videos. I honestly believe they are magical.

SHERLOCK (BBC)







HARRY POTTER


SUPERNATURAL


SUPERWHOLOCKIN (SUPERNATURAL, DOCTOR WHO, SHERLOCK)





OneTaste Presents - SGB


Thursday, 24 May 2012

Annotated Bibliography


THE ALLISON BADEN-CLAY MURDER MYSTERY

Annotated Bibliography


Wolper, A. 2011, "Trial by Media", Editor & Publisher, vol. 144, no. 10, pp. 22-23,35.

Author, Allan Wolper, is a professor of journalism at Rutgers University, and the host of "Conversations with Allan Wolper" a podcast on WBGO.org, an NPR affiliate in the New York area. Wolper has won over 50 journalism prizes and his ethics columns in Editor & Publisher) have been honoured by The National Press Club and the New York chapter of the Society of Professional Journalists (Wolper, 2011).  These accomplishments suggest that the author is both experienced and a reliable source on the topic of ‘professional media, journalism, and communication’ (the article appears to come from education, not pure opinion). Wolper’s journal article discusses the notion of ‘trial by media’ – a concept which focuses on professional media influencing the outcome of a legal case through the extensive coverage of an incident from one particular angle. Wolper presents the reader with many examples where ‘trial by media’ has been apparent.  Citing such cases, the author strengthens the credibility of the journal article and adds weight to his argument.  Despite such references, however, the strongly opinionated and biased viewpoint from which the article has been written cannot be ignored.



Unknown (Writer). (2012, May 21). Murder Twist [Visual News Report]. Brisbane: A Current Affair. Retrieved from http://aca.ninemsn.com.au/article/8470880/murder-twist

The ‘Murder Twist’ report, broadcast by Channel Nine network’s ‘A Current Affair’ program, appears as an update on the murder case of Queensland mother, Allison Baden-Clay.  The report confirms the murder of Baden-Clay but states that no cause of death has yet been released.  The ‘investigation’ focuses on recent evidence that suggests that Gerard Baden-Clay, husband of the deceased, was having an affair with a work colleague whilst Allison was alive.  The report has been designed to encourage audiences to question the motives of the husband and his lover. An interview during the report delivers audiences the following line: “everyone has got a theory and everyone is playing this game of ‘murder mystery’.”  The report challenges the audience to ‘solve the mystery’.  The journalist goes on to state that “a mum of three young girls disappears, police say it’s murder and that her killer is someone that she knew.  Now a picture emerges of a marriage in turmoil.”  Footage is then shown of Gerard Baden-Clay entering a police station for questioning.  Interviews with members of the public highlight how the case affects ‘normal people’.  When partnered with the emotive music that is played throughout the report and the increasingly negative portrayals of Allison’s husband, Gerard, the intentions of ‘A Current Affair’ are clear.  Although the media text presents a factual report to its audience, the information is carefully selected to play on particular audience emotions in order to generate the desired reaction.  The source is heavily biased, unreliable as a primary source, and demonstrates ‘trial by media’ in action.



Baskin, B. (2012, May 21). Police continue inquiry into Allison Baden-Clay's murder despite having suspect. The Courier-Mail, p. 8.

Brooke Baskin, author of The Courier-Mail article, presents an accurate recount of the known information in the case of murdered mother of three, Allison Baden-Clay. The article is concise, contains neither bias nor opinion, and achieves its purpose – to inform its audience. Although no credentials or professional history can be found for the author, Baskin, her employment at The Courier-Mail and publication of her article suggests that the information is accurate and reliable.  This article corroborates with the A Current Affair report to an extent, but does not share its opinionated view and accusatory angle.  The article does not promote the ‘trial by media’ concept but supports the position of professional media, communication, and journalism within society.



Davies, L. (2012, May 5). Friend of murdered woman laments: 'She told me things, I should have done more'. The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from http://www.smh.com.au/national/friend-of-murdered-woman-laments-she-told-me-things-i-should-have-done-more-20120504-1y489.html

Looking deeper into the increasingly complicated murder of Allison Baden-Clay, Lisa Davies, author of The Sydney Morning Herald article, presents a gossip-styled article stating that “behind the manicured lawns of Brisbane’s western suburbs, the locals can’t stop talking.”  The article begins emotionless – looking at the insidious events of the past month with nothing more than superficial interest and the possibility of ‘juicy gossip’.  “It’s an irresistible topic, murder. But it usually happens somewhere else, to people not from around here,” Davies’ writes.  The author has manipulated quotes from Allison’s close friends in an attempt to draw in readers (the title, for example, is taken out of context).  Like the video report by A Current Affair, Davies’ article places focus on the likelihood of the police naming husband, Gerard Baden-Clay, as a suspect. “Officers have refused to rule out anyone as a suspect....... While detectives are publicly keeping their options open about a suspect as one of her closest loved ones, Mr Baden-Clay is automatically under scrutiny”, she reports.  A greater emphasis is placed on highlighting Gerard Baden-Clay’s behaviour before the discovery of his wife’s body.  He is described as “a bundle of hand-wringing nerves, tears not quite visible”.  The bias and intended angle is obvious is Lisa Davies’ article.  All professional media texts corroborate with one another, in spite of differing authors, mediums, and news organisations.  The intentions of the media is clear, and they are supported by Allen Wolper’s academic journal article.   Despite negative connotations surrounding the accuracy, legitimacy, and reliability of modern journalism, a common angle amongst mediums cannot be ignored. 



Reference List


Baskin, B. (2012, May 21). Police continue inquiry into Allison Baden-Clay's murder despite having suspect. The Courier-Mail, p. 8.

Davies, L. (2012, May 5). Friend of murdered woman laments: 'She told me things, I should have done more'. The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from 

Unknown (Writer). (2012, May 21). Murder Twist [Visual News Report]. Brisbane: A Current Affair. Retrieved from http://aca.ninemsn.com.au/article/8470880/murder-twist

Wolper, A. 2011, "Trial by Media", Editor & Publisher, vol. 144, no. 10, pp. 22-23,35.

Thursday, 26 April 2012

Factual Storytelling Exercise


Saudade.



It is unfortunate that I can have the most hilarious of evenings, be content and, on the odd occasion, happy; I can be in the company of my best friends or be simply distracted, and yet should I find myself awake after midnight, as if by clockwork, a great sense of sadness falls over me.  I cannot control it, I cannot stop it. 

It is more than a feeling, more than a creeping sense of loss.  It is an undeniable longing for things that have not been, things that never were, and things that used to be; for the past and present and future to collide and align in perfect harmony.  It is knowledge, ignorance, and understanding.  It is hope, and it is the absence of that very thing.  It is growing old at eighteen, it is unjustifiable exhaustion, it is love and hate and compassion and empathy, selfishness and selflessness.  It is the end of all things and the search for the promised open door. I call it saudade.

“Saudade is a Portuguese and Galician word for a feeling of nostalgic longing for something or someone that one was fond of and which has been lost. It often carries a fatalist tone and a repressed knowledge that the object of longing might never return. It was once described as ‘the love that remains’ or ‘the love that stays’ after someone is gone.” (source unknown)
Tales of loss and heart break are always the most difficult to tell. Tales of saudade are harder. 

When I was fifteen, I met a boy.
When I was sixteen, I fell in love.
When I was seventeen, he broke my heart.
Now, at eighteen years of age, I have a story to tell.

Most people can recall their first heart break – the pain, the rejection, the weeks of bad films and even worse music. A broken heart can often be overlooked, mocked, or ignored. Often, especially in young adults, it can last several weeks.

Mine sent me into a twelve month depression.

It is difficult to know where to begin, for my memory of the past year has melted inwards and the months can be recognised only by major events.  With this in mind, I shall start my story where all good romance novels refuse to go – the end.


There are three characters in my tale – the boy, I shall call him ‘J’; the friend, I will call her ‘S’; and myself. J and I had been friends since we were fifteen. It had begun as a light, school-girl crush (something I never admitted to at the time), and as opportunity allowed, we grew closer over the years.  We were friends, but everyone knew that it was more, and everyone was thrilled – we were the “people’s couple” so to speak. Comments were made by students and teachers alike, hinting that J and myself would inevitably become ‘an item’. After months of denying our feelings, it became official.  In the days that followed, the word “finally!” has never been so overused in the history of language.   

Many people will argue that love cannot be understood at such a young age – that the emotion involved is merely an imitation of the real thing and that it should not be toyed with. I believe, with all my heart, that at sixteen I was irrevocably, unconditionally, in love with J. He was my best friend, I trusted him completely, and I became the best possible version of myself during the months that we were together.

Introducing S.
S was one of my closest girl friends, and had been for many years.  We were two completely different people, and yet somehow, it worked. S and J were always friends. Very, very good friends. I need not explain the nature of the events which occurred throughout my relationship with J, but I was assured by both boyfriend and best friend that I need not worry about their alarmingly close friendship. I trusted them both to the ends of the Earth, and even after several occasions where my forgiveness was begged for, I accepted their stories.

I do not think that it is necessary for me to detail the fall out of a text-book love triangle – the film industry won’t let us forget what they are about, and so it will come as no surprise when I reveal that my relationship ended messily, and in the public eye.  I lost my boyfriend, my best friend, and my emotional stability in one conversation, and once again, everyone knew. S and J were together almost immediately.
I was in desperate need of space and time to compose myself and neither was ever offered.  J led me on an emotional rollercoaster that – confessing his love for me, then speaking of S and their ‘connection’.  After four months, my trust in people was shattered, my self esteem had never been so low, I had never been so disappointed, and eventually, exhaustion kicked in. 

In the midst of my personal dramas, my senior year was suffering.  My grades dropped across the board from ‘Very High Achievements’ to, in some cases, a standard fail. My teachers expressed their concerns, the distance that I had placed between my friends and I was nearly irreparable, and I lost control.  It was no longer possible for me to hide my condition and gradually, a small group of people began to notice.  I stopped eating, I did not sleep, I refused to read or write – previously pastimes I had always adored.  I stopped playing sport, I found excuses to not attend friendly gatherings, and I was cruel to my immediate family.  After months of pain and rivers of tears, I opened up to my parents.  I have never felt so supported, so loved, and such relief than I did that evening. 

After spending two weeks at home to try and recuperate, I returned to school with a new resolve. I forgave S and J, I wished them all the happiness, and after accepting that the damage done by J would take years to heal, I began to rebuild my friendship with S.

I may be just eighteen years of age, but I have seen people change. I have seen sides to people I wish I had never witnessed, and my opinions and understandings of things have shifted along with them.  It has come to my notice, that high school sucks (surprise, surprise).  High school sucks, and heartbreak sucks, and every teenage cliché is true, but it only made finishing last year all that more of a relief.  I may have reached a stage in my life where I am past the drama and the lies and the immaturity, but I know understand that not everyone is here with me.  The people I relied on the most, at the end of the day, didn't turn out to be the people I believed them to be. I realised that to trust yourself with others at this age, both in a relationship and amongst friends, is to put your happiness in the hands of another.  It is foolish and naive and at eighteen, it isn't a risk that should be taken - no matter how much someone means to you.  Your happiness? Your emotional and mental state? It is yours.  To give that willingly to someone, is to hand away the only thing you can keep as your own, and at the end of the day, it isn't worth it.
Getting through your teenage years is hard. We all have our own dramas, we all go through different forms of pain, but we're meant to.  We have to.  If we can survive these years, our most vulnerable and impressionable years, and emerge decent people, then we've beaten the rest.  It's a learning curb.  All of it.


None of us are alone and it is always going to get better eventually. 


"Every person down there is ignoring your pain because they're too busy with their own." (Spike; Buffy The Vampire Slayer)

We're still teenagers, but we won't be forever.

Thursday, 19 April 2012

Lecture 6

Commercial Media


Honeymoon period is over. Most definitely. In fact, we've completely skipped stage 2: comfort. Now we hate each other.  We have now reached the point in the Journalism relationship, where we argue every day, and pick at the petty points of our conversation. This is the beginning of the downhill spiral - the beginning of the end and the rocky bottom of our love affair.  Good luck to us both.

In week 6 of JOUR1111, we were taught about the nature of Commercial Media and its place in society.  Commercial media, at a glance, includes things such as:

  • Channel Seven
  • Channel Nine
  • Channel Ten
  • Foxtel
  • AUSTAR
  • News Limited
  • Fairfax Media
Commercial media exists to make profit, and this can be done through movies (20th Century Fox), newspapers (The Australian, Quest Community Newspapers, and The Courier Mail), dating sites (RSVP.com), ticketek.com, ninemsn, magazines (Woman's Weekly, Cosmopolitan, Cleo, Woman's Day, etc.), radio stations (B105, Triple M), and search engines.



"The first duty [of the media] is to shun the temptations of monopoly. Its primary office is the gathering of news. At the peril of its soul it must see that the supply is not tainted. Neither in what it gives, nor in what it does not give, nor in the mode of presentation must the unclouded face of truth suffer wrong. Comment is free, but facts are sacred."C.P. Scott (Editor / Owner of The Guardian)

The lecture addressed the control that the major commercial media organisations have over what us, as consumers, are exposed to, and the legal and ethical obligations that they have on their path to control.

I was most interested in the information about internet censorship and the extent to which it goes.  Censorship is not a new concept, but it was surprising to hear its scope within Australian media (the possibility of Dr. Redman's website being mistake for a porn site was fairly entertaining in itself).

The parallel's drawn between the quality of stories shown on commercial media new programs (such as A Current Affair, and Today Tonight) twenty years ago and today was particularly poignant. The idea of 'dumbing down' the news is an obvious ploy in commercial media today and can be seen in a multitude of outlets.  Commercial news is rarely addressed to the curious individual, and I would go as far as to say that it is 'lazy' news, and addresses mediocre issues with cheap stories.